Preparing Teachers to Close the Gap: How Innovative Teacher Education Can Help English Learners Succeed
The
Challenge: Persistent Achievement Gaps for English Learners
In
America's classrooms, English learners (ELs) consistently underperform compared
to their English-proficient peers. Despite decades of educational reforms and
specialized programs, this achievement gap persists as one of education's most
stubborn challenges.
My
research examined a promising approach to this problem: transforming how we
prepare teachers to work with English learners. Rather than training only ESOL
specialists, what if we equipped every teacher with the skills to
effectively teach language and content simultaneously?
A New
Approach to Teacher Preparation
Traditionally,
English learners were pulled out of mainstream classes for specialized English
instruction. While this approach had benefits, it often created an unintended
side effect: general classroom teachers sometimes felt less responsible for
ELs' learning, viewing these students as primarily the ESOL specialist's
responsibility.
The
"One-Plus" teacher preparation model takes a different approach by
infusing EL-focused content throughout the entire teacher education curriculum.
This means all future teachers—whether they're planning to teach math, science,
social studies, or any other subject—learn specific strategies for working with
English learners in their mainstream classrooms.
The
"One-Plus" model is flexible, with different levels of preparation
depending on what subjects teachers will teach:
- Basic coverage for all
teachers
- More specialized preparation
for academic content teachers
- Enhanced training for language
arts teachers
- Full ESOL endorsement or
certification options
What I
Wanted to Know
My
research examined whether this approach actually works. Specifically, I asked:
- How effective are teachers
prepared through the One-Plus model at narrowing achievement gaps between
ELs and non-ELs?
- What student factors (like
socioeconomic status, ethnicity, disability status) influence academic
achievement?
- What teacher factors (like
subject area, grade level taught, class size) affect student outcomes?
- Did teacher effectiveness in
working with ELs improve over time?
The
Study: A Large-Scale Analysis
To answer
these questions, I analyzed data from 768 preservice teachers who completed the
One-Plus preparation program and taught more than 20,800 K-12 students during
their student teaching internships. This large sample covered five academic
semesters (Fall 2016 through Fall 2018).
The study
measured student performance at two points in time:
- Pretest scores: Measuring students' prior
knowledge before instruction
- Posttest scores: Measuring learning after the
preservice teachers taught their units
By
comparing these scores and examining how different student groups performed, I
could determine whether the achievement gaps between ELs and non-ELs narrowed
after instruction from One-Plus prepared teachers.
What I
Found: Promising Results
The
Achievement Gap is Real
First, the
study confirmed what previous research has shown—there are significant
achievement gaps between various student groups at the start of instruction:
- English learners scored
approximately 8.5 points lower than non-ELs on pretests
- Students with disabilities
scored about 7.2 points lower than students without disabilities
- Low-income students (measured
by free/reduced lunch eligibility) scored about 3.7 points lower than
higher-income peers
- Black students scored about
3.2 points lower than White students
- Hispanic students scored about
1.4 points lower than White students
The Gap
Narrows After Instruction
The most
important finding was that One-Plus trained teachers significantly reduced
these gaps. After instruction:
- The EL/non-EL gap shrank by
approximately 50%
- The gap between low and high
socioeconomic status students decreased by about 40%
- The gap between students with
and without disabilities narrowed by about 38%
- The gap between Black and
White students decreased by about 48%
- The gap between Hispanic and
White students decreased by about 26%
While gaps
still existed, they were substantially smaller, suggesting that the One-Plus
preparation model effectively equipped teachers to better support all students,
particularly historically underperforming groups.
The
Trend Held Steady
Analyzing
data across five semesters revealed that this pattern of improvement was
consistent over time. This suggests that the One-Plus model produced a stable,
positive effect rather than a one-time anomaly.
Other
Important Factors
The
research also revealed other interesting patterns:
- Class size matters: Students in smaller classes
(fewer than 20 students) had higher achievement than those in larger
classes.
- Grade level differences: ELs in higher grade levels
faced greater challenges, likely because the language demands increase as
students progress through school.
- Subject area effects: After instruction from
One-Plus teachers, students' performance in mathematics and science showed
particularly strong improvement compared to other subjects.
Why
This Matters
These
findings have significant implications:
- Teacher preparation makes a
difference.
How we prepare teachers can directly impact their ability to narrow
achievement gaps.
- All teachers need EL training,
not just specialists.
The One-Plus model demonstrates that when all teachers learn strategies
for working with ELs, student outcomes improve.
- Systematic infusion works
better than isolated courses.
Embedding EL-focused content throughout teacher preparation seems more
effective than offering standalone courses on working with diverse
learners.
- Equipping teachers with
specific strategies helps.
The One-Plus model provides teachers with concrete approaches for making
content comprehensible while developing language skills.
Moving
Forward: Implications for Education
While this
research shows promising results, the achievement gap hasn't disappeared.
There's still work to be done. However, the findings suggest several paths
forward:
- Teacher preparation programs should consider infusing
EL-focused content throughout their curriculum rather than isolating it in
specialized courses
- School districts might provide similar
professional development to current teachers
- Educational policymakers should consider the role of
teacher preparation in addressing persistent achievement gaps
- Researchers should continue investigating
what specific components of the One-Plus model contribute most to
narrowing achievement gaps
By
equipping all teachers with the tools to support English learners effectively,
we can move closer to the goal of educational equity—where every student has
the opportunity to succeed regardless of their language background.
Citation:
Ghimire, N. (2020). Narrowing
English Learner (EL) achievement gaps: A multilevel analysis of an EL-infused
teacher preparation model [Doctoral dissertation, University of Central
Florida]. Electronic Theses and Dissertation, 2020-216. https://purls.library.ucf.edu/go/DP0023508
Pull
Quotes
"After
instruction from teachers prepared in the One-Plus model, the achievement gap
between English learners and their peers narrowed by approximately 50%."
"How
we prepare teachers matters. Systematic infusion of strategies for teaching
English learners throughout teacher education appears more effective than
isolated coursework."
"The
findings suggest that when all teachers learn strategies for working with
English learners, rather than just specialists, student outcomes improve across
the board."
Comments
Post a Comment