Reading Success: What Really Matters for Teens?

 Read the full article here

When it comes to understanding why some teenagers excel at reading while others struggle, the answer isn't simple. In our recent study published in Reading Psychology, we found that reading success depends on a complex web of factors spanning students, teachers, technology use, and school environments.

The Digital Balancing Act

Think about the technology in your home. Computers, tablets, smartphones – these tools have transformed how teens access and process information. Our research revealed something fascinating: having a computer at home was associated with higher reading scores (about 36 points higher), and students who had internet access and actually used it scored nearly 39 points higher than those without access.

But here's the catch – there's such a thing as too much technology. When we looked at households with an abundance of devices (more than 9), we found that reading scores actually began to decline. This suggests that while digital access matters, having too many devices might become a distraction rather than an advantage.

Beyond Devices: The Teacher Factor

Remember that teacher who seemed to make everything click? Our findings confirm what many of us intuitively know – teacher experience matters. Teachers with more years in the classroom were associated with better student reading outcomes. Specifically, teachers who had completed longer teacher education programs tended to have students with higher reading scores.

Interestingly, a teacher's age showed a different pattern – as teachers' age increased beyond the average, reading scores tended to drop slightly. This wasn't about older teachers being less effective, but rather highlights the complex interplay between experience and other factors.

The Home Environment: Powerful Influences

Perhaps the most striking findings in our research centered around family background factors. Students' cultural and linguistic backgrounds showed strong connections to reading performance:

• English-speaking students scored about 25 points higher than peers speaking other languages
• Students born in the United States performed better on reading assessments
• Parental education levels, particularly mothers' education, played a substantial role in reading achievement

These associations don't mean that speaking another language at home or having immigrant parents causes lower reading achievement. Rather, they highlight areas where targeted support might help level the playing field.

Location, Location, Location

Where students attend school also matters significantly. Our analysis revealed that students in large cities or rural areas had lower reading scores compared to those in suburban areas or medium-sized towns. This geographical disparity points to potential differences in resources and opportunities.

The most powerful school-related factor was economic status. In schools where more than 75% of students received free or reduced-price lunch, reading scores were substantially lower – about 110 points below schools with fewer economically disadvantaged students. This sobering finding highlights how socioeconomic factors continue to shape educational outcomes.

School location and resources significantly impact reading achievement.

Putting It All Together

What makes our research unique is that we examined how all these factors – student background, home technology, teacher characteristics, and school context – work together rather than in isolation. Using advanced statistical techniques (structural equation modeling), we found that:

1. Home technology access shows a positive relationship with reading achievement – but moderation is key
2. Teacher experience and education positively contribute to reading outcomes
3. Student sociodemographic factors exert strong influences that may require targeted interventions
4. School context, especially socioeconomic composition, significantly shapes reading success

What This Means for Parents, Educators and Policymakers

Our findings suggest several practical implications:

For parents: Providing access to digital tools is important, but balance is key. A few quality devices with appropriate oversight likely trumps an abundance of technology. Additionally, engaging with your child's reading and learning at home makes a real difference.

For educators: Experience and professional development matter. Schools should value and retain experienced teachers while ensuring continued growth opportunities, as this benefits student reading achievement.

For policymakers: Addressing resource gaps between schools in different locations and socioeconomic contexts remains crucial. The substantial differences in reading outcomes based on school location and poverty levels call for targeted resource allocation and interventions.

The Bigger Picture

Reading proficiency doesn't develop in isolation – it emerges from a complex ecosystem of influences spanning home, school, and broader social contexts. While our study identified significant relationships, it's important to note that we analyzed data from a single time point. Longer-term research might reveal additional patterns and relationships.

What's clear, however, is that supporting adolescent reading requires a comprehensive approach that addresses multiple layers of influence. By understanding these interconnected factors, we can work more effectively to ensure all teens have the opportunity to become confident, capable readers.

---

Citation:

Ghimire, N., & Mokhtari, K. (2025). Mapping connections across layers: Interrelationships between key factors and 15-year-old’s reading scores. Reading Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2024.2432882

---

Pull Quotes

"While digital access matters for reading achievement, having too many devices might become a distraction rather than an advantage."

"Teacher experience emerged as the most significant contributor to reading scores, suggesting experienced teachers may significantly improve student reading achievement."

"Reading proficiency depends on a complex web of influences spanning home, school, and broader social contexts – addressing any single factor in isolation is unlikely to close achievement gaps."